The reason why this page has more game information than the average puzzle game, is because this game has a lot more things in it than the average puzzle game. Notice this page is not allowed to have any tips or strategies posted on it. How do these people finance all the promotion (TV spots, etc.)В ? Where do the money come from to maintain this 'free' video gameВ ? Wikipedia is a media for information, not a users guideВ ! Drlivingstone ( talk) 11:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC) This page seems to be written by obsessed players, not people thinking about business issues, but you may find this link informative: This is an informational page. I'm a bit surprised there is no information about 'Candy Crush Saga''s economic model. Mumbogumbo ( talk) 22:58, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Where is the real information about Candy Crush SagaВ ? This wiki page has been fixed, and is no longer the overly detailed mess that it used to be. Any thoughts?ДЄlso, the reason that I don't use the overly detailed tag is because I have used it before but it gets removed the next day.В :/ - chaotic_iakВ ( talk) 09:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)ДЇor the sake of completion, it should be noted the 'overly detailed' remark referred to a previous version of the wiki page. This kind of detail better fits a wiki specialized for the game. This page, as it currently stands, is too detailed for Wikipedia.

Mumbogumbo ( talk) 00:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC) Overly detailed This can be verified by the 'Yay, I completed level # in Candy Crush Saga!' messages on those users' Facebook pages, that are created by the Candy Crush game itself. 64.134.196.89 ( talk) 01:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Just for future reference, within a few days of a new release, there will always be multiple people that have beaten all the levels. Anyone can confirm these facts (or prove that they are incorrect)? Chaotic iak ( talk) 09:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC) I added a fact tag to the paragraph, but feel fr ee to remove it entirely as it cannot seem to be proven. However, googling either name with 'Candy Crush Saga' doesn't give any article for the corresponding citation.

In the Popularity section, they are mentioned. Mumbogumbo ( talk) 22:56, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Julian Oxborough and Thupten Namgyal Apteva ( talk) 18:43, (UTC) I forgot to mention I fixed this semi-recently. I would think this appearance instead would be called 'product placement' for advertising purposes, instead of 'cameo'. Mumbogumbo ( talk) 19:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)ДЄ cameo is a brief appearance of a prominent, well known actor. Also, Bejewelled is actually a spin-off of Panel de Pon.Of course! Bejewelled has spun off a lot of similar styled games.Like Komalsekhawat ( talk) 11:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC) No section ДЄnyone else see a very strong resemblance to Bejewelled? The overly detailed information was removed for a reason! Do not attempt to add it back. will tell you that the wikipedia is not the place for overly detailed information. 23 Solution to the over-detailed problemДO NOT add overly detailed information to the Candy Crush wiki page!.22 Should Candy Crush Saga be regulated.20 Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2014.16 Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2014.15 IDIS-497 Interdisciplinary Studies Portfolio вЂ“ Wikipedia Project.10 Candy crush IS NOT Candy Crush Saga!!.8 Charms/Boosters in relation to cheating.6 Where is the real information about Candy Crush SagaВ ?.1 DO NOT add overly detailed information to the Candy Crush wiki page!.

Candy crush wiki 1055